In
my opinion Norman’ article is a somewhat unnecessarily long paper that an be
succinctly summarized. The basic idea of this article is based on things that
do not function like they should due to poor design and/or poor instructions. A
poor design can completely ruin a consumer product by rendering it hindersome
or even useless. A somewhat comical example he uses that is extremely relatable
to the average person are doors that are either push or pull doors but are
designed to look like the opposite of their intended function. We have all at
some point or another attempted to push open a “pull” door and had ourselves
look a bit foolish in the process. I think most people like to blame themselves
rather than considering the design of these doors to be a bit confusing. Norman
questions why consumers tolerate these types of products. He also argues that
technical communicators can solve these problems be being increasingly more
detailed in instruction manuals and product designs. This is just one of many
designs discusses by Norman in this extensive essay.
One good
design he discusses that someone may not think about is the universal design of
scissors. Scissors are designed to have one large hole and one small hole on
the handle to indicate to the user where to place each finger. Thanks to its
design we instinctively hold scissors comfortably and in the proper way. I
think the overall point of this article was to showcase how technical
communicators have an opportunity and responsibility to design product in a way
that can be understood by the average person. In order to do this technical
communicators could test the usability and practicality of products before
releasing them to the public.
No comments:
Post a Comment