As
the title suggests, this article is about concerns that have arisen within
technical communication due to the fact that the field is a relatively new one
that lacks the basic research guidelines that more established fields have. She
argues that this is important because every professional and academic field is
defined by the research it conducts. As new student of technical communication
this struck home for me because I often find myself having difficultly
explaining my major to people who ask what it is about. Nearly every person
that I tell my major to inevitably asks this question because technical
communication is a field that is so new that the majority of people do not even
know what it is. In addition I found her point that English departments often
clash with our field very relatable because when I tell people my major another
common reaction is people assuming technical communication is a concentration
in the English major which can become irksome because in my mind there is a big
difference. Another reason why it I important to establish research questions
is because the field is similar to other more established fields. This can make
it difficult for professionals to distinguish themselves and what they can
offer to potential employers. However I think this can be a good thing for
technical communicators because it allows us to explore career opportunities in
additional fields. Overall Rude’s argument is that as technical communicators
it is important to continue to build a foundation for our field so that we can
gain more recognition in the professional and academic world.
No comments:
Post a Comment